would be bottom if they didn't have Bill Russell the most overrated player of all time
Fax the only people say in arguments is his rings when he has 9 hall of famers on that team
I have already disproven the "hE hAd TeN hOfErS" misconception. Without Bill, only 3-4 of those players would've made the HOF. The only reason they made it was because Bill was the ultimate teammate who made his teammates superior players.
But the thing is, this is who is winning in a 5V5, yes I probably think Bill is better all-time now, Wilt had more all-around skill imo. But yes both would lock each other down. I'm thinking of making top get Bird since bottom's guards are over powered.
If this is a 5v5 situation, when Bill's team is gonna win pretty easily. Wilt was a selfish player who only cared about personal stats and accolades. Bill was quite the opposite.
Bill is the most underrated play of all time. He's called overrated so much to the point where people have forgotten his true greatness and what he really accomplished on the greatest basketball team dynasty that was lead by him.
PG - Magic has the obvious mismatch here with his height.
SG - This decision is pretty clear, MJ wins in this matchup.
SF - KD is the greatest pure scorer of all time and can score from anywhere, not to mention his above average defensive abilities, point to him.
PF - This is probably the most interesting lineup matchup here. While LeBron would only just be able to contain Duncan to the point where he doesn't dominate, there is no way Duncan is locking down LeBron. LeBron wins this matchup.
C - This pick may vary from person to person, but I truly believe that Bill wins this matchup. He's the second greatest defender of all time and was the only player in the '60s that was able to stop Wilt year in year out. Point to him.
Top - 1
Bottom - 4
I'm picking bottom to win.
I feel like Wilt and Bill could go either way, Bill may be higher all-time, but they could both lockdown each other. Curry may be able to get a few shots off. Elgin is very underrated as a player, he averaged 36 but isn't as high all-time because he has no chips. So yeah bottom would win but it wouldn't be a blow out.
Yeah, bottom wouldn't win with a big margin. Though I do feel as though you are overrating Baylor. He's only 6'5" and was only able to average 36ppg to the insane pace that the '60s played at. Inflation definitely plays into this a lot.
Yeah when I think of it Durant would destroy Baylor, we're talking about a 7'0 player who is arguably the greatest scorer of all-time. He plays above-average defense and Baylor is way shorter.
who is the best defender?
true amazing shot blocker but imo billy
I guess it's just down to opinion
curry mj durant tim wilt
bottom because 3 players on top cant shoot threes
I do agree with your choice of bottom, but how exactly does 3-pt shooting abilities determine this outcome? There are more important factors that would influence the result such as pure scoring ability, perimeter defense, interior defense, playmaking and facilitating. All five guys on the top team can score at an insane level whether it be outside or inside scoring.