• 0
  • 0
86 Overall
  • 78 INS
  • 75 OUT
  • 67 PLY
  • 78 ATH
  • 75 DEF
  • 81 REB

Comments Sort by

    2

    solomon hill is not a bust.

    2

    neither is marvin williams

    -3

    Solomon hill is most def a bust. He averages less than 6 pts per game and he plays 22 minutes. That's pathetic. Marvin Williams is a better bust but still bad. I never thought he played well and he had more bad nights than good ones.

    Show 14 replies...
    1

    not a scorer.

    -3

    Solomon isn't and Marvin wasn't anything

    1

    or are you just saying that.

    1

    did you watch solomon hill

    -3

    yes, and he is pretty much garbage. Do you like Solomon Hill or do u just not think that he is a bust?

    1

    i just dont think he is a bust

    -3

    ok then. I've watched Solomon Hill and personally, I don't find much admiring. But who do you think were draft busts?

    2

    the rest in the lineup were draft busts

    -4
    1

    also solomon hill was drafted 23rd overall and personally me 23rd draft picks dont count as busts.

    -3

    they say that every person who makes it into the NBA is a good player so he technically counts

    -1

    no does not count

    1

    solomon hill is a defender.

    1

    Tyson got carried every team he went to
    melo carried him at Knicks and dirk carried him at Mavs so for me he never had a prime he is garbage just like his beard

    0

    I agree. But I think that his best years were '08-'10

    1

    did i see greg oden here? NOT A BUST

    -3

    If Oden is not a bust who do you think is?

    -3

    Most def a bust. Over 9 years he only played 105 games. On an average of 19 minutes per game, he only scored 8 pts. Oden is beyond bust. And he was the first pick. Oden was chosen over Durant, Horford, Conley, and Rudy Fernandez. Oh, come on.

    -1

    Btw. 3 years he played
    If you count his injured years it’s still only 7

    Show 1 reply...
    -3

    that adds to why he's a bust. Sometimes you can't control the fact that you're a bust. But Tyson was a bad player and a player who was always injured.

    -1

    injuries. dude had bad knees

    Show 1 reply...
    -3

    nobodies fault but to the detriment of all the teams he played for

    0

    How tf is oden a bust

    -2

    First, he said so himself that he was a bust. He always had injuries so he missed a few years of playing. He literally had 7 knee surgeries during his career. His rookie year was pushed back because he missed the whole '07 draft. Also, he was picked before players like Durant, Horford, & Conley. In high school and college, he did well, but during the NBA, he didn't win not one accolade. He only had 2 years (08-10) where he did ok. Rather than that, he did horrible. He only had 8 PPG, 6.2 RPG, and 1.2 BPG. Rather if it was his consistent injuries alone or if it was also his lack of skill, it doesn't matter. He is still a bust.

    -1

    Darko and maybe hill are the only busts here

    -3

    So who do you believe are draft busts?

    -1

    The two I just said
    Anyway this lineup should’ve never been created, most busts aren’t in 2k

    Show 1 reply...
    -1

    Who is and who isn't a bust is of course a personal opinion. There are a lot of busts though like you said no in 2k. The worst: Anthony Bennett.

    -1

    markelle got injured and tyson won dpoy

    -1

    Definitely not a bust to me

    -1

    Markelle still starts!

    -4

    His stats have been crap since he was drafted.

    -4

    even before he was injured, his playing was trash

    -2

    Tyson Chandler is not a bust, he is going to be a hall of famer, look at his resume and Andrea Bargnani is not a bust either.

    0

    no he's not

    -2

    Most def are busts. Tyson Chandler is not a good player and hasn't done much to show anything worth being entered into the HOF. And a bust just means he did nothing for the team that drafted him. He was useless. Andrea didn't play in the NBA but went overseas and played. That makes him a draft bust.

    -1

    ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED?? TYSON CHANDLER ISNT A BUST SPED

    Show 37 replies...
    -3

    I would def say he is.

    1) He was drafted 2nd overall with high hopes. He was literally drafted before Pau Gasol, Tony Parker, Joe Johnson, Jason Richardson, Richard Jefferson, Gerald Wallace, Tony Parker, and Scalabrine.

    2) As a center, his points, defense, and rebounds are pretty much trash.

    3) He is just not a good player.

    0

    First off your wrong. Chandler was a player who didnt need to Score to be effective.
    Second off your actually retarded saying Tyson had no defense. Tyson is a 3x All Defensive Team member and a DPOY.
    Third, Chandler Was a All-Star and a top 3 center in 2013.
    Fourth, Chandler made A All-NBA Team something 2 of the 8 people you named have done.
    And finally, Chandler is a NBA champion. Something 4 out of the 8 people you named have done. With a resume like this idk why you think chandler is a bust

    -3

    Centers do need to score to be effective. Scoring in te pain is one of the main jobs of a center. Even if Tyson is a 3x All-Defensive Team member and a 1x DPOY, he has been playing this game for 20 years. 3/20 = 15%. He has only been effective 15% of the time. Again, he was a 1x All-Star and a top 3 center in 2013. But he's played for 20 years. 1/20 = 5%. I understand your claim of the All-NBA team, but you're statistics are wrong. 4 of the 8 people I mentioned made an All-NBA Team. And lastly, you can't base someone's career off of how many championships they've won. Think about players like Elgin Baylor, Karl Malone, Patrick Ewing, Charles Barkley, Allen Iverson, John Stockton, and others. Never won a ring, but still was inducted into HOF. This just goes to prove that Tyson Chandler...is most def a bust.

    -1

    According to that logic Bill Russell is a bust then

    -2

    These are his accolades in his 13 yrs of playing:

    11× NBA champion (1957, 1959–1966, 1968, 1969)
    5× NBA Most Valuable Player (1958, 1961–1963, 1965)
    12× NBA All-Star (1958–1969)
    NBA All-Star Game MVP (1963)
    3× All-NBA First Team (1959, 1963, 1965)
    8× All-NBA Second Team (1958, 1960–1962, 1964, 1966–1968)
    NBA All-Defensive First Team (1969)
    4× NBA rebounding champion (1958, 1959, 1964, 1965)

    Big difference.

    -1

    BUT LIKE YOU SAID CENTERS NEED TO SCORE TO BE EFFECTIVE AND BILL RUSSELL COULDNT SCORE ALOT.

    -2

    Bill scored 2x as many ppg as Tyson did.

    -1

    Bro Look at Tyson chandler Mavericks or Knicks highlights, I promise you, that will change your mind.

    -2

    I def agree that his best years of play were on the Mavericks and Knicks. He was ok from 06-08 and 11-13?

    -1

    Right Now he is trash, For his career and prime he was a pretty good center and great defense.

    -2

    He was only good in his prime to me. His whole career around those specific years has been trash. And he certainly is trash now. He gets worse the older he becomes.

    -1

    He was Part of a big three during those years, For the Mavs it was Dirk, Kidd, and him and for the knicks it was Melo, stoudemire, and him

    -2

    That just means he could ride off the shoulders of these superstar players. Even Melo and Dirk at that time were in their prime.

    -1

    Kinda, He needed them but they needed him. Tyson Chandler was a plugin piece to help teams out be better and a better defense, he was a bootleg Joakim Noah, now he is a plug in piece mentor. Like I said before, he was only there for defense, so when he started he was good but when he wasn't he couldn't shine, so he became trash. But he is going to be a hall of Famer though.

    -2

    I highly doubt that he will be a HOF'er. Which one though do you think is worse? Chandler or Oden?

    -1

    He wasn't bad, he was just injured, and had gotten picked over a few hof'ers.

    -1

    Oden, He was good for his career but I don't like saying he was a bust because of his injuries. He never really had a chance, but he was good. He was a good center and I think he was the 6th man for the blazers.

    -1

    But if you compare chandler and oden before oden's injury chandler is 2x better

    -2

    I would agree.

    -2

    Yeah, sometimes being a bust is something you can't control.

    -1

    oh wait Centers need to score apparently?? so with your logic Dikembe Mutombo is a bust then since he didnt score a lot

    -3

    His defense made up for his shooting. And scoring is a big bonus. I meant to say it makes you more effective.

    -1

    He only played defense tho.

    -3

    I know.

    -1

    same as chandler and they both had good careers. now your going against what you said

    -3

    Nah I'm not. Would Dikembe have been better if he shot more from the paint? yes. But Tyson neither shoots from the paint nor was he or is he consistently good at defense. He doesn't do what he needs to do as a center and that is my personal opinion of Tyson.

    -1

    BRO YOUR 12 YEARS OLD YOU NEVER SEEN PRIME TYSON CHANDLER

    -2

    I am not 12, that's for sure.

    -1

    KID CHANDLER WAS A TOP 3 SHOTBLOCKER EVERY YEAR OF HIS CAREER

    -2

    And with an average of 1.15 blocked shots per game, he never was a top blocker. He had led the NBA in offensive rebounds in both 2006–07 and 2007–08, ranking second in the league in rebounds per game in 2006–07, and third in rebounds per game in 2007–08. But nothing about blocks did he do well in. So from 06-08 and 11-13 he was ok. But Chandler has been, is, and will forever be a draft bust.

    -2

    bro your actually retarded. Chandler isnt a bust and centers dont need to score to be effective

    0

    bro you're retarded

    -1

    8.2 and 9 is trash? For a dpoy who’s rebounding and offensive stats are watered down because he’s stuck around longer? Wow

    -3

    He was ok from '11-'13 but that's it. It took him 10 years to accomplish anything cool and since '13 he has been trash.

    -1

    Since ‘13 is after his prime. Is Vince carter a bust for all he did after 2013

    -3

    He would be if he never did anything great after. Although his stats declined, he always was a good player.

    -1

    Idek whether to take you serious or not anymore